![]() |
www.DoSomethingAboutIt.org.uk |
| What? Why? How? Join UsAboutNewsfeed | I'm sorry but is this an apology? Within the last few days, both David Cameron and Gordon Brown have made apologetic noises in the press. Have they gone far enough? Or should we continue campaigning? David Cameron On Friday 13 March, David Cameron delivered a speech that was billed as an apology of sorts by the Telegraph. But was his apology what we were looking for? You can judge for yourself by reading the whole speech here. The 'apologetic' passage was: 'if we're honest, we must also recognise that some of our economic difficulties today relate not only to what has happened in the last ten years, but also to certain fundamental weaknesses that have been there for decades'. There is no explicit recognition of Conservative responsibility for the atrophy of industry that began in the 1980s, no explicit apology for the free market philosophy that underpinned it. While Cameron is correct to point out that 'in the last decade, the Labour government abandoned manufacturing - letting it lose over a million jobs - in favour of financial services and housing', that's not quite the whole story:
Despite believing that 'we just don't have the regional economies, the skilled workforce or the different industries and markets to fall back on and drive us through this recession', Cameron nevertheless refuses to do anything about it, once again renouncing fiscal stimulus and claiming 'Britain can't afford to do very much'. This is not strictly true. Although the bail-out of the banks has burdened future generations with colossal levels of debt, further public spending would be no bad thing provided the extra liability incurred improves our overall ability to repay. Conversely, if foregoing fiscal expansion means mass unemployment, economic stagnation and social unrest, we will be hard-pressed to meet our existing obligations. Yet that seems to be precisely the scenario that Cameron is predicting. Gordon Brown In an interview with the Guardian on Tuesday 17 March, Gordon Brown makes his own pseudo-apology: 'I take full responsibility for all my actions, but I think we're dealing with a bigger problem that is global in nature, as well as national. Perhaps 10 years ago after the Asian crisis when other countries thought these problems would go away, we should have been tougher'. There's no mention in that article, or its companion piece, of the UK's unique difficulties, and New Labour's failure to address Britain's unhealthy dependence on the financial services sector, spiralling levels of household debt, and extreme disparities between the richest and the rest. But Brown apparently 'refuses to rule out a further British economic stimulus in the April budget', and does admit that 'laissez-faire has had its day. People on the centre-left and the progressive agenda should be confident enough to say that the old idea that markets were by definition efficient and could work things out themselves is gone. That doesn't mean to say that what government does is always right.' Summary Neither statement is particularly satisfying, though Brown's proposals are slightly closer to the agenda that DoSomethingAboutIt.org.uk advocates. Is that enough? No. And it doesn't have to be. The next election need not be a two-horse race. Although there are, in some constituencies, Labour and Conservative candidates who are more progressive than their party leaders, there are also many progressive Lib Dem candidates, Green candidates, SNP, Plaid Cymru and independent candidates, all of whom could be electorally viable - provided progressives coordinate their votes and pool their energies, constituency by constituency. That's why we have to do something about it. NOD, 17 March 2009
Your email address is for verification purposes only and will not be displayed. |
©copyright owners of dosomethingaboutit.org.uk, dsai 2009 |
||||||